|
Identification of a ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma
asteris’-related strain associated with spike disease of sandal (Santalum
album) in India
J.A. Khan*, P. Srivastava and S.K. Singh
Plant Virus Laboratory, National Botanical Research Institute, Rana
Pratap Marg, Lucknow 226 001, India
*jawaidkhan@satyam.net.in
Accepted for publication 31/01/06
Sandal (Santalum album) is a hemi-root parasitic tree, famous
for its high-valued scented heartwood and oil. It commonly occurs in the
dry regions of peninsular India, particularly in Karnataka and Tamil
Nadu states. Sandal spike is a major disease of sandal, attributed to
phytoplasma aetiology, as shown by three independent groups at the same
time (Dijkstra & Ie, 1969; Hull et al., 1969; Varma et al.,
1969). The disease is characterised by witches’-broom symptoms,
consisting of small, narrow leaves which turn pale-green or yellow on
branches. Affected leaves become overcrowded due to internodes
shortening and standout stiffly from branches, acquiring a spike-like
appearance (Fig. 1). Leaves and branches dry out and affected plants
eventually die-off within a couple of years from the first appearance of
symptoms. Although a non-specific PCR assay has been developed for the
detection of phytoplasmas in sandal (Khan et al., 2004), the
associated phytoplasma remains unidentified.

Figure 1: Upper - Healthy looking sandal (Santalum album)
tree (left) and a naturally-infected tree
exhibiting symptoms of sandal spike disease (right). Lower - Leaves from
infected (right) and healthy (left) trees.
Total DNA extracted separately from leaves of either healthy or
diseased sandal was used as template in a nested PCR assay employing
phytoplasma rDNA universal primer pairs P1/P7, followed by
R16mF2/R16mR1, as previously described (Khan et al., 2004). A
nested PCR product of about 1.2 kb was amplified from a diseased plant
but not from symptomless plants (Fig. 2).

Figure 2: Agarose gel showing nested-polymerase chain reaction
amplification of 16S rDNA of sandal spike (SAS) phytoplasma of Ca. 1.2
kb. The template consisted of products of direct PCR obtained from crude
DNA extracts of symptomatic leaves of five different naturally infected Santalum
album (sandal) plants (lanes 1-5); H= healthy control; M= λ DNA
digested with EcoRI and HindIII.
The PCR products obtained from symptomatic leaves of five separate
diseased plants were digested with restriction endonucleases AluI,
HinfI and RsaI. The resulting Restriction Fragment Length
Polymorphism (RFLP) profile for each enzyme was identical, indicating
that all PCR positive plants contained a similar phytoplasma (Fig 3).
The PCR product was purified, cloned and sequenced. The sequence was
archived in GenBank (accession number DQ0932357). Pair wise comparison
of the rDNA sequence by BLAST analysis revealed that it is most similar
(99%) to ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma asteris’-related strains,
previously classified as 16S rDNA RFLP subgroup 16SrI-B members. This is
the first definitive identification of a subgroup 16SrI-B phytoplasma
associated with sandal spike disease.

Figure 3: Polyacrylamide gel (6%) showing AluI, HinfI
and RsaI digested Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism of
nested PCR amplified 16S rDNA (Ca. 1.2 kb) of a phytoplasma derived from
symptomatic leaves of five different naturally infected Santalum
album (sandal) plants (lanes 1-5); M= λ DNA digested with EcoRI
and HindIII; L= 100 bp DNA ladder.
References
Dijkstra J, Ie TS, 1969. Transmission by dodder of sandal spike
disease and the accompanying mycoplasma-like organisms via Vinca
rosea. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 75,
374-378.
Hull R, Horne RW, Hayer RM, 1969. Presence of mycoplasma-like bodies
associated with sandal spike disease. Nature 224,
1121-1122.
Khan JA, Srivastava P, Singh SK, 2004. Efficacy of nested-PCR for the
detection of phytoplasma causing spike disease of sandal. Current
Science 86, 1530-1533.
Varma A, Chenulu VV, Raychaudhuri SP, Prakash N, Rao PS, 1969.
Mycoplasma-like bodies in tissues infected with sandal spike and brinjal
little leaf. Indian Phytopathology 22, 289-291.
|