Reports Search NDR About NDR Editors Author Info Submission Links

Natural occurrence of phytoplasma associated with chickpea phyllody disease in Pakistan - a new record

Khalid P. Akhtar1*, T. M. Shah1, B. M. Atta1, M. Dickinson2, F. F. Jamil1, M. A. Haq1, S. Hameed3 and M. J. Iqbal3

1 Nuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology, Faisalabad, Pakistan
2
School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, LE12 5RD, UK
3
National Institute of Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering, Faisalabad, Pakistan

*kpervaiz_mbd@yahoo.com

Accepted for publication 08/10/07

During spring 2005-06 chickpea plants (cultivars Desi and Kabuli) were found to be affected by a previously undescribed disease in Pakistan. Symptoms consisted of proliferation of branches with smaller leaflets, giving a bushy appearance to the plants (Fig-1). Affected plants were scattered in the field and were more easily spotted at flowering and podding time. The flowers developed abnormal green structures (phyllody) instead of normal flowers (Figs. 2 and 3). At the time of crop maturity when the healthy plants were drying the diseased plants in the field were conspicuously green (Fig. 1). 


Figure 1: Conspicuously green diseased chickpea plant. 

Figure 2: Healthy flower on left & abnormal green
structure (phyllody) on right. 
Figure 3: Phytoplasma infected branch on right
and healthy branch on left side. 

Tissue samples from infected and uninfected plants were examined using a transmission electron microscope (TEM) to ascertain if the disease was associated with a phytoplasma. Typical pleomorphic bodies (phytoplasma) mostly spherical to oval of a size ranging from 200-600 nm were observed only in the sieve elements of affected samples. The bodies had opaque, low electron density cytoplasm that contained ribosome like granules, DNA-strand-like structures and lacked nuclear membranes (Fig. 4), similar to previously reported phytoplasmas (Ajayakumar et al., 2007). Such bodies were absent from healthy samples, from xylem cells, phloem parenchyma cells and companion cells of affected plants. In addition, DNA was extracted from affected plants and amplified using the universal phytoplasma PCR primers P1/P7 followed by R16F2n/R16R2. PCR products were characterized by RFLP analysis and partial sequencing. All samples from infected plants gave a 1250bp PCR product and the RFLP profile associated with 16SrII phytoplasmas, and partial sequencing confirmed that the phytoplasma had the greatest homology to 16SrII phytoplasmas. Koch's postulates were fulfilled in a greenhouse. Five week-old chickpea plants grown in pots were inoculated by grafting. A set of control plants was kept without grafting. Phyllody symptoms similar to those observed in the field started to develop after 25-35 days in graft-inoculated plants while no disease symptoms were observed on control plants.


Figure 4: TEM of phytoplasma colonizing the phloem of an infected stem.

Chickpea has been grown in Pakistan for many years without any reported incidence of phyllody. The presence of phytoplasma disease in chickpea presents a new threat to the chickpea in Pakistan. Previously the disease was found in Ethiopia, India, Myanmar (Ghanekar et al, 1988); Australia (Saqib et al. 2005) and Oman (Al-Saady et al., 2006). To the best of our knowledge this is the first report of chickpea phyllody disease in Pakistan.


References 

Ajayakumar PV, Samad A, Shasany AK, Gupta MK, Alam M, Rastogi S, 2007. First record of a Candidatus phytoplasma associated with little leaf disease of Porticlaca grandiflora. Australasian Plant Disease Notes 2, 67-69.

Al-Saady NA, Al-Subhi AM, Al-Nabhani A, Khan AJ, 2006. First record of a Group 16SrII phytoplasma infecting chickpea in Oman. Plant Disease 90, 273. 

Ghanekar AM, Manohar SK, Reddy SV, Nene YL, 1988. Association of a mycoplasma-like organism with chickpea phyllody. Indian Phytopathology 41, 462-464.

Saqib M, Bayliss KL, Dell B, Hardy GEStJ, Jones MGK, 2005. First record of a phytoplasma-associated disease of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) in Australia. Australasian Plant Pathology 34, 425-426.

The British Society for Plant Pathology