|
Spread into Rwanda of the severe cassava mosaic virus
disease pandemic and associated Uganda variant of East African
cassava mosaic virus (EACMV-Ug)
J.P. Legg1,2*, G. Okao-Okuja1,
R. Mayala3 and J-B. Muhinyuza3
1 International Institute
of Tropical Agriculture, Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Centre,
Kampala, Uganda
2 Natural Resources Institute, Chatham Maritime, UK
3 Institut des Sciences Agronomiques du
Rwanda, Butare, Rwanda
*jlegg@infocom.co.ug
Accepted for
publication 17/04/2001
Cassava is a key food security staple in the Great
Lakes zone of East/Central Africa. During the 1990s, a devastating
pandemic of unusually severe cassava mosaic disease (CMD) spread through
Uganda and into the neighbouring countries of Kenya and Tanzania, caused
principally by the emergence and spread of the Uganda variant of East
African cassava mosaic virus (EACMV-Ug)(Geminiviridae: Begomovirus)
(Otim-Nape et al., 1997). In July 2000, a survey was conducted in
Rwanda to determine the presence or absence of severe CMD and EACMV-Ug.
Twenty-six farmers’ cassava fields were assessed in the major
cassava-growing regions of the country. At each site visited,
assessments were made of CMD incidence, severity (using a 2-5 scale) and
infection type (whitefly- or cutting-borne), and leaf samples were
collected from two symptomatic plants for virus diagnosis. A standard
PCR diagnostics procedure was used, in which specific primer pairs for African
cassava mosaic virus (ACMV) and EACMV-Ug were used for detection
(Zhou et al., 1997).
|

Fig. 1. Severe whitefly-borne CMD
infection in cassava, Umutara, Rwanda
|

Fig. 2. CMD pandemic affected zone (yellow),
Rwanda, July 2000
|
CMD incidence was low throughout the areas surveyed
(26.7%) and there were no clear differences between administrative
regions. By contrast, CMD symptoms were markedly more severe in the
north-eastern Umutara administrative region (score 3.6)(Figs. 1/2) than
in the other areas surveyed (2.4) and in Umutara, most infection was
whitefly-borne (83%) whilst in other areas infection was largely
cutting-derived (81%). These contrasts in patterns of CMD severity and
infection type matched virus distributions. ACMV was detected in 26
samples, collected from locations throughout the surveyed area.
EACMV-Ug, however, was only detected in 6 samples, all from Umutara. One
EACMV-Ug infected plant was also infected with ACMV. Mean severity
scores for virus-tested samples were: ACMV (2.9), EACMV-Ug (4.0),
ACMV+EACMV-Ug (5.0). These data together provide evidence for the recent
spread into Rwanda of the EACMV-Ug associated pandemic of severe CMD,
almost certainly through migration of viruliferous whitefly populations
from the neighbouring countries of Uganda and/or Tanzania, which had
been affected in previous years (Legg, 1999). As a consequence of this
development, there is an urgent need for CMD control, through the
deployment of host plant resistance, as has been done in Uganda, Kenya
and Tanzania.
References
Legg JP, 1999. Emergence, spread and strategies for
controlling the pandemic of cassava mosaic virus disease in east and
central Africa. Crop Protection 18, 627-237.
Otim-Nape GW, Bua A, Thresh JM, Baguma Y, Ogwal S,
Semakula GN, Acola G, Byabakama B, Martin A, 1997. Cassava mosaic virus
disease in Uganda: The current pandemic and approaches to control.
Natural Resources Institute, Chatham, UK.
Zhou X, Liu Y, Calvert L, Munoz C, Otim-Nape GW,
Robinson DJ and Harrison BD, 1997. Evidence that DNA-A of a geminivirus
associated with severe cassava mosaic disease in Uganda has arisen by
interspecific recombination. Journal of General Virology 78,
2101-2111.
|