First report of a phytoplasma associated with abnormal proliferation of cladodes in cactus pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) in Italy

M. Tessitori¹*, V. Masenga² and C. Marzachì²

¹ DISTEF-Patologia vegetale, Università di Catania, Via S. Sofia 100, I-95123 Catania, Italy
² Istituto di Virologia Vegetale, CNR, Strada delle Cacce 73, I-10135, Torino, Italy

*mtessitori@unict.it

Accepted for publication 29/06/05

While Mexico is the main cactus pear producing country, Italy is the most important producer in the Mediterranean basin. No phytoplasma disease of cactus pear has been reported, despite previous detection of phytoplasmas in related species such as Opuntia tuna (Casper et al., 1970) and O. linguiformis showing witches’-broom symptoms (Cai et al., 2002). In 2003, three cactus pear plants showing abnormal growth were observed in the DISTEF collection. The plants showed severe proliferation of cladodes with lack of flowers, fruits and spine production. Viral particles were not observed by transmission electron microscopy in sap from any of the symptomatic plants.

Figure 1: abnormal proliferation of cladodes in cactus pear. 
In the back are visible healthy plants with normal cladodes and fruits.

Total DNA was extracted from the symptomatic plants and from two asymptomatic cactus pears as described by Cai et al., (2002). This was used as template for phytoplasma-specific 16S rDNA PCR amplification using either of three universal primer pairs: P1/P7, R16f2/r2 (Lee et al., 2000) or fU5/rU3 (Lorenz et al et al., 1995). DNA preparations from phytoplasma reference strains maintained in periwinkle were used as positive controls. To produce enough amplicon for further characterisation by RFLP analysis, nested primer pair R16f2/r2 was used to reamplify P1/P7-primed rDNA products. RFLP analysis was performed with restriction enzymes AluI, HhaI, HpaII, MseI and TaqI.

Phytoplasma-specific PCR products were amplified from all three symptomatic plants with P1/P7 and fU5/rU3 primers by direct PCR and with R16f2/r2 primers by nested PCR. Asymptomatic plants were always negative in all three PCR assays. The RFLP patterns obtained from analysis of rDNA amplicons from all symptomatic samples were identical to pattern obtained for reference strain faba bean phyllody phytoplasma, a member of the 16S rDNA RFLP subgroup 16SrII-C. This is the first report of a phytoplasma infecting O. ficus-indica.

References

Cai H, Chen HR, Li F, Kong BH, 2002. First report of a phytoplasma associated with cactus witches’-broom in Yunnan (China). Plant Pathology 51, 394.

Casper R, Lesemann D, Bartels R, 1970. Mycoplasma-Like Bodies and viruses in opuntia tuna with witches’-broom disease. Plant Disease Reporter 54, 851-853.

Lee IM, Davis RE, Gundersen-Rindal DE, 2000. Phytoplasma: phytopathogenic mollicutes. Annual Review of Microbiology 54, 221-225.

Lorenz K-H, Schneider B, Ahrens U, Seemüller E, 1995. Detection of the apple proliferation and pear decline phytoplasmas by PCR amplification of ribosomal and nonribosomal DNA. Phytopathology 85, 771-776.

The British Society for Plant Pathology