Plant pathology is relevant to many groups of people beyond the relatively small community of plant pathologists themselves - the general public, those involved in public policy (including higher education) and, not least, scientists working in other subjects.
BSPP has taken steps to address important strategic issues in the science of plant pathology, most recently in new ventures in publications, selecting topics for meetings and improving publicity. The focus of these projects is directed towards improving the service to members and in promulgating plant pathology amongst - well, mostly other plant pathologists. How do we as a Society see the position of plant pathology in contemporary science, in informing national and international debate on science, including genetic modification, sustainable agricultural production, maintenance of biodiversity?
I list below some of these issues, with some exploratory questions, and invite members of BSPP to do the following.
1. Review the major topics and identify omissions.
2. Consider whether or not the Society should review its rôle
in contemporary science.
3. If yes, consider future action:
Molecular biology, genomics and post-genomics research and application
Plant pathology undoubtedly benefits from developments in molecular
biology but:
Sustainable agricultural production
We take it as axiomatic that plant diseases are important in limiting
agricultural production but,
Biodiversity and systematics
This is a highly emotive topic that frequently generates more heat
than scientific light. We might ask:
Epidemiology and ecology
Steps that BSPP could take to enhance the role of plant pathology
in contemporary science are currently being considered by a subcommittee
of BSPP's Board. The views of members and other scientists are most welcome: please post your
contribution in relation to the issues raised here to the discussion
forum.
Chris Gilligan
President, BSPP